The Making of “Maid of Honor”

August 24th, 2010

bridesmaid_wb_bas_ton_col_stvig_cal_grad_br

Freckles have to be one of my favorite facial features. So when I saw that one of the bridesmaids in a wedding I was shooting had them in spades, I was thrilled. Of course, the venue wasn’t ideal for classic portraiture, but I had to use what I had at my disposal. The room where the bridal party was getting ready was lit by one bulb planted squarely in the center of the ceiling and one blind-enclosed window. Because the groomsmen tended to gather almost right outside this window, we could only barely open the blinds at any given moment, meaning the light slanted steeply downward. In short, it was a low-light situation where I couldn’t capitalize on the direction of the light at hand.

But luckily I had the FA 31/1.8 with me, so I boosted the ISO to 400 and counted on it to do its magic.

I took one photo before she started posing for me (read: big smiles), and this is it:

bridesmaid_orig

The lighting, as I mentioned, was uneven – her torso and shoulder are much brighter than her face, but I figured I could fix that in post-processing; the important thing to me was to get her face correctly exposed so that I could bring out those freckles when the time came.

For the “classic” post-processing I ended up with, I actually changed very few of the original settings. The white balance (which was on “AUTO” for the camera) stayed the same; the basic tone elements – exposure, recovery, fill light, and blacks – also remained the same. I actually decreased the brightness and the contrast, which led to this slight difference:

bridesmaid_wb_ton

The tone curve is where things start to go drastic. I set the Highlights to +90, the Lights to +100, the Darks to 50, and the Shadows to -57. The curve created is a deep falloff, with a crazy photo to prove it:

bridesmaid_wb_bas_ton

The idea, though, with trying to create a dramatic photo is that sometimes you have to use dramatic settings. Once we tone down the vibrance a bit (to -7) and the saturation (to -15), the photo already looks better:

bridesmaid_satvib

As you can see, the blue dominates the photo, but there are two other important colors – red and orange. They comprise the majority of her facial colors. By adjusting the hue, saturation, and luminance of each of those colors, we can pinpoint precisely what we want to stand out (in my case, the freckles!).

I changed the hue of “Red” to +100, which is going to give it an oranger color. I like the look of slightly desaturated lips, so I adjusted saturation to -5. Then I brought up the luminance to +17 so that the red bits are a bit brighter:

bridesmaid_red

Most of her skin is “Orange,” though, so by playing with those same settings, I’m really going to affect the overall photo. I set the hue toward the red end of the spectrum to -38. Next I desaturated it to -69 and brought the luminance all the way up to +100:

bridesmaid_orange

Now to get rid of that sea of blue. I left the hue the same and desatured to -57 and kicked the luminance up to +57 for the “Blues”:

bridesmaid_blue

So all those edits and a couple of tweaks with the yellow and aqua result in this:

bridesmaid_wb_bas_ton_col

Because so much of the color is gone, I like to add a bit back by adding split-toning. In this instance, I went for a gold highlight (Hue: 48, Saturation: 32) and a peach shadow (Hue: 39, Saturation: 17) with the balance between the two skewed toward the shadows (to the tune of -49).

A vignette pushed nearly to the max provides dark shadows around the edges.

bridesmaid_wb_bas_ton_col_stvig

I’m still not a fan of where the light is falling, so I decided to use a couple of the tools provided by Lightroom 2 – namely, the gradient and the brush.

For the first gradient, I reduced the exposure by nearly a full stop (-.90) and the brightness to -60. I also kicked up the clarity a bit to help alleviate the softness brought about by the shallow depth-of-field. I pulled the gradient up from the bottom-right corner.

bridesmaid-grad1

For the second gradient, I actually increased the exposure to +.70 and pulled it directly from the right toward her face. The idea was to mimic light that would have been coming directly from an uncovered window rather than that downward light I had to deal with.

bridesmaid-grad2

Next to the brushes. I ended up using five different brushes: one for the left side of her face, two for her hair, and two for her eyes. The key to using brushes is to pay strict attention to the feathering and to the flow.

For the first brush, I wanted to darken the left side of her face and bring out those freckles (disregard the settings. Lightroom doesn’t like having screencaps made of it). For the settings, I set Brightness to -20, Contrast to +30, and Clarity to +75.  I had the feathering set to almost its maximum and the flow set toward the minimum. That meant I had to make multiple passes over the areas I wanted to affect the most, but this way there would be no tell-tale lines between brushed and non-brushed.

bridesmaid-brush1

For the second brush, I wanted to bring out the details of the curls in her hair. Once again, I painted with a large brush set to lots of feathering and little flow. I used the “Erase” function with similar settings to make sure I didn’t accidentally brighten her face.

bridesmaid-brush2

The third brush complemented the second; it specifically brightened the crown of her hairline where the hair sweeps back.

bridesmaid-brush3

Next it was time to work on the eyes. They looked a little muddy to me, so I brightened the white portions by increasing the exposure and brightness.

bridesmaid-brush4

And finally, to really make them pop, I used another brush where I focused mainly on the irises to increase the exposure, the contrast, and the clarity.

bridesmaid-brush5

And there you have it! If you’d like to download this preset, click here or head over to the Lightroom Presets!

The Day the Alligators Almost Ate Me

May 18th, 2010

I’ve been thinking about getting the DA 15mm, and one of the members of a photography forum I frequent suggested I go out and shoot some photos at 15mm to see if it was wide enough, since that was my primary concern. I was in the midst of typing responses when I thought “Hey, I really should go do this. Like RIGHT NOW.”

Since it pouring rain, I decided to forego the non-weatherproof DA 12-24 and opted instead for my barely-used DA* 16-50, figuring that 16mm is pretty darn close to 15mm for my experiment and that lens can withstand an arctic blizzard and come out fine. I also brought along the DA* 200 (also weatherproof), because the place I had in mind is in the middle of the wildlife prairie reserve here, and I would REALLY be kicking myself if I came across the wild bison and didn’t have anything longer than 50mm.

When I got to the parking area, I realized I was the only person there (probably not a huge surprise considering the weather). I duly called a friend to let someone know where I was and set off down the trail. The trail runs by a body of water known as a sink, and it’s rather acclaimed for being a guaranteed spot to see alligators in the wild, but they usually stick to the water or the banks, and with the banks being fairly steep and a raised boardwalk for pedestrians running around the water, I’ve always felt relatively safe (even though I usually forego the boardwalk and wander around in the prairie).

I was out in the grasslands, beyond the safety of the boardwalk and miles from any other person, switching between the 200mm and the 16-50, taking my normal shots of moss…

…the butterflies…

…the birds…

as I walked along. (Sidenote: I was much more enamored with the 200mm lens today rather than the 16-50). As the temperature grew warmer and the rain subsided, I was just wrestling out of my raincoat when I turned the corner only to see THIS blocking the path ahead of me :

I froze. Then I slowly raised the camera and started shooting. I was just looking around, trying to figure out the best way to get to relative safety without arousing the gator’s interest when I saw another alligator so close to me that I could barely get its head in the frame with the DA* 200:

Somehow, I managed to stop my shaking hands long enough to get a couple of shots that weren’t blurry. As the gator closest to me made its way to the water, I was able to inch my way backwards without tripping, shooting all the while.

So, lesson learned. With an alligator that close, you’re better off having the DA* 50-135.

New Lightroom Preset: Romance with Blue

May 4th, 2010

I saw someone on a photography forum ask how to get that low contrasty, vintage look, so I had a play with some settings in Lightroom. Hope you enjoy!

Romance with Blue

Romancewithblue