<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Scenic World &#187; Photography Tutorial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ascenicworld.com/category/photography-tutorial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ascenicworld.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:33:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Purples: Actually Getting the Shot</title>
		<link>http://www.ascenicworld.com/2010/04/30/the-purples-actually-getting-the-shot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ascenicworld.com/2010/04/30/the-purples-actually-getting-the-shot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 12:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keitha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography Tutorial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ascenicworld.com/?p=1828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve posted this picture before, but I feel it warrants another view. This is how I looked one day after some serious macro shooting:

Macro shooting isn&#8217;t easy. Lots of shot require you to get seriously down into the dirt so that you have the most interesting vantage point. Of course, that doesn&#8217;t apply if you&#8217;re [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ascenicworld.com/2010/04/30/the-purples-actually-getting-the-shot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Singing the Praises of Ultra-Wide</title>
		<link>http://www.ascenicworld.com/2009/11/30/singing-the-praises-of-ultra-wide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ascenicworld.com/2009/11/30/singing-the-praises-of-ultra-wide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keitha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography Tutorial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ascenicworld.com/?p=1334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I remember when I first started on my lens quest, I didn&#8217;t even consider an ultra-wide lens. I thought that 21mm was wide enough for me. It wasn&#8217;t until I received the DA 12-24/4 that I started embracing the idea that not all keepers had to have bokeh (yeah, I was quite smitten with being [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ascenicworld.com/2009/11/30/singing-the-praises-of-ultra-wide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aperture Stars: Star-Gazing at the End of the World</title>
		<link>http://www.ascenicworld.com/2009/11/16/star-gazing-at-the-end-of-the-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ascenicworld.com/2009/11/16/star-gazing-at-the-end-of-the-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keitha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography Tutorial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ascenicworld.com/?p=1294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I had the distinct pleasure to go out to Cedar Key  with my good friends J-Fin, c_love82, and santefeegret. I left my wide-angle of choice, the 12-24, at home with the intention of using my oft-neglected fisheye instead. At our very first stop, I took a photo of a dock with the fisheye, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ascenicworld.com/2009/11/16/star-gazing-at-the-end-of-the-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Perfect Landscape Lens</title>
		<link>http://www.ascenicworld.com/2009/11/13/a-landscape-lens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ascenicworld.com/2009/11/13/a-landscape-lens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keitha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography Tutorial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ascenicworld.com/?p=1284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I got my first DSLR, I knew I wanted to invest in prime lenses. In fact, the Pentax primes were one of the big reasons (in small packages!) that I bought the brand. The camera came with the kit lens, but I immediately sold that and got the FA 43/1.9. I loved and love [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ascenicworld.com/2009/11/13/a-landscape-lens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Macro Lenses: 35mm vs. 100mm</title>
		<link>http://www.ascenicworld.com/2009/10/29/macro-lenses-35mm-vs-100mm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ascenicworld.com/2009/10/29/macro-lenses-35mm-vs-100mm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Keitha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography Tutorial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ascenicworld.com/?p=1180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve written before that if I could take only two lenses with me on an outing where I had no idea what the shooting subjects would be (people? flowers? landscapes?), I&#8217;d take my beloved D-FA 100/2.8 Macro and the FA 31/1.8. So when I can only take one lens on an outing, the DA 35/2.8 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ascenicworld.com/2009/10/29/macro-lenses-35mm-vs-100mm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
